PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-35.79%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
987.72%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x PLUG's 59.72%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
165.89%
EBIT growth above 1.5x PLUG's 25.67%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
165.89%
Operating income growth above 1.5x PLUG's 30.68%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
479.74%
Net income growth above 1.5x PLUG's 18.88%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.46%
Share reduction while PLUG is at 0.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-2.46%
Reduced diluted shares while PLUG is at 0.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-163.38%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-201.42%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
10.79%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
119.97%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of PLUG's 205.77%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
-28.44%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PLUG stands at 189.10%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-1016.95%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-462.70%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-47.31%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
336.32%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 3.59% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
1037.50%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-62.50%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.31%
Below 50% of PLUG's 2339.42%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
55.73%
Below 50% of PLUG's 144916.55%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.72%
Our AR growth while PLUG is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
30.13%
Inventory growth well above PLUG's 23.86%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-0.81%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
8.82%
Positive BV/share change while PLUG is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-10.95%
We’re deleveraging while PLUG stands at 0.99%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-100.00%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
133.02%
SG&A growth well above PLUG's 10.51%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.