PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-37.40%
Negative revenue growth while PLUG stands at 24.70%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
129.53%
Positive gross profit growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
556.16%
EBIT growth above 1.5x PLUG's 0.90%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
556.16%
Positive operating income growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-88.90%
Negative net income growth while PLUG stands at 1.46%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-100.00%
Negative EPS growth while PLUG is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-100.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while PLUG is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
306.15%
Share change of 306.15% while PLUG is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
9.27%
Diluted share change of 9.27% while PLUG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
126.09%
OCF growth above 1.5x PLUG's 40.09%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
111.67%
Positive FCF growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-64.35%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PLUG stands at 159.50%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-38.26%
Negative 5Y CAGR while PLUG stands at 19.93%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-75.66%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PLUG stands at 37.04%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
6692.19%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-75.19%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-88.30%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
582.30%
Positive 10Y CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-95.35%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-97.71%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.25%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while PLUG is at 1801.46%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-66.93%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while PLUG is at 12108.37%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-72.70%
Firm’s AR is declining while PLUG shows 45.19%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
136.98%
Inventory growth well above PLUG's 20.19%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
37.29%
Asset growth above 1.5x PLUG's 2.17%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-75.05%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
69.85%
Debt growth far above PLUG's 8.93%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
93.56%
We expand SG&A while PLUG cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.