PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-47.69%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
0.48%
Positive gross profit growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-48.14%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-48.14%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-64.13%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-62.96%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-62.96%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.58%
Share reduction while PLUG is at 0.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
0.64%
Diluted share count expanding well above PLUG's 0.24%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-163.45%
Negative OCF growth while PLUG is at 31.37%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-180.97%
Negative FCF growth while PLUG is at 19.02%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
482.38%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to PLUG's 502.88%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
546.35%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 36.52%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
314.68%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 14.95%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
-2943.31%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-6929.20%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-250.99%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
2072.00%
Positive 10Y CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
1593.94%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
469.94%
Positive short-term CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
86332.39%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 22124.03%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
238.84%
Below 50% of PLUG's 8798.01%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
74.60%
Below 50% of PLUG's 251.76%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-62.89%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
96.60%
Inventory growth well above PLUG's 13.26%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
19.14%
Positive asset growth while PLUG is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
20.81%
Positive BV/share change while PLUG is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
111.67%
Debt growth far above PLUG's 0.25%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
94.56%
SG&A growth well above PLUG's 4.25%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.