PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
100.00%
Revenue growth above 1.5x PLUG's 11.80%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
10.33%
Positive gross profit growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
78.01%
Positive EBIT growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
78.01%
Positive operating income growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
100.00%
Positive net income growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
100.00%
Positive EPS growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
90.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.88%
Share count expansion well above PLUG's 1.11%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.61%
Diluted share count expanding well above PLUG's 1.11%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-100.08%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
26555.94%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 372.19%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
1181.48%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 34.02%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
273.22%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 149.28%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
-4108.13%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-13639.91%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-243.07%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
1403.26%
Positive 10Y CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
3061.96%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
440.05%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 5.33%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
60878.89%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 2868.30%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
235.90%
Below 50% of PLUG's 38449.53%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
64.91%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 38.64%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.21%
AR growth well above PLUG's 34.29%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.65%
Positive asset growth while PLUG is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-0.87%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
3.31%
We have some new debt while PLUG reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.59%
We cut SG&A while PLUG invests at 6.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.