PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-82.06%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-66.00%
Negative gross profit growth while PLUG is at 28.44%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-123.40%
Negative EBIT growth while PLUG is at 54.97%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-123.40%
Negative operating income growth while PLUG is at 28.02%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-139.08%
Negative net income growth while PLUG stands at 53.96%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-140.00%
Negative EPS growth while PLUG is at 56.60%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-142.11%
Negative diluted EPS growth while PLUG is at 56.60%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
1.85%
Share reduction more than 1.5x PLUG's 5.79%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
-0.12%
Reduced diluted shares while PLUG is at 5.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
129.64%
OCF growth above 1.5x PLUG's 30.88%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
120.13%
FCF growth above 1.5x PLUG's 37.85%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
142.30%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PLUG's 350.02%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-24.58%
Negative 5Y CAGR while PLUG stands at 122.52%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
13.36%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PLUG's 33.82%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
657.42%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
333.39%
Positive OCF/share growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
565.52%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-650.00%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while PLUG is at 18.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-287.50%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-475.00%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
4382.33%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 1228.88%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
132.10%
Below 50% of PLUG's 85496.37%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
73.11%
Positive short-term equity growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while PLUG invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-41.70%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
4.93%
Inventory growth well above PLUG's 1.52%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-9.39%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-11.60%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-63.18%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-100.00%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-1.16%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.