PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-41.24%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-44.89%
Negative gross profit growth while PLUG is at 68.51%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-73.94%
Negative EBIT growth while PLUG is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-86.49%
Negative operating income growth while PLUG is at 86.27%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-69.08%
Negative net income growth while PLUG stands at 85.27%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-70.00%
Negative EPS growth while PLUG is at 86.54%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-70.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while PLUG is at 86.54%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.93%
Share reduction more than 1.5x PLUG's 3.49%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
-2.64%
Reduced diluted shares while PLUG is at 3.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-185.61%
Negative OCF growth while PLUG is at 19.56%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-187.98%
Negative FCF growth while PLUG is at 14.52%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
170.06%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to PLUG's 160.24%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
-15.95%
Negative 5Y CAGR while PLUG stands at 5.69%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
39.74%
Positive 3Y CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-428.17%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-180.20%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while PLUG is at 43.24%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-72.79%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PLUG stands at 69.27%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
498.00%
Positive 10Y CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-40.20%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
99.33%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 23.22%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
935.04%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 128.39%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
82.81%
Below 50% of PLUG's 449.22%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
85.42%
Positive short-term equity growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.07%
Our AR growth while PLUG is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
0.58%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. PLUG's 1.59%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-2.85%
Negative asset growth while PLUG invests at 0.85%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
8.13%
BV/share growth above 1.5x PLUG's 3.30%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
14.17%
We have some new debt while PLUG reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-100.00%
Our R&D shrinks while PLUG invests at 30.56%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-12.77%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.