PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.00%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x SLDP's 7.80%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
8.77%
Positive gross profit growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
75.69%
EBIT growth 75-90% of SLDP's 100.00%. Bill Ackman would push for cost reforms or better product mix to narrow the gap.
75.69%
Positive operating income growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
77.97%
Positive net income growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
100.00%
Positive EPS growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
66.67%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
31.77%
Slight or no buybacks while SLDP is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
9.28%
Slight or no buyback while SLDP is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
311.99%
Positive OCF growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
225.39%
Positive FCF growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-87.28%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SLDP stands at 1291.51%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-74.73%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SLDP stands at 1291.51%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-64.55%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SLDP stands at 142.51%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-74.79%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
321.80%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SLDP is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-100.57%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
61.50%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SLDP is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
93.84%
Positive short-term CAGR while SLDP is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.55%
Our AR growth while SLDP is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-7.33%
Inventory is declining while SLDP stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
7.41%
Positive asset growth while SLDP is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-129.89%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.94%
We expand SG&A while SLDP cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.