0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
100.00%
Revenue growth above 1.5x SLDP's 7.80%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
-39.64%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
50.46%
EBIT growth 50-75% of SLDP's 100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
50.46%
Positive operating income growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
100.00%
Positive net income growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
133.33%
Positive EPS growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
75.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-4.47%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
3.45%
Slight or no buyback while SLDP is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Positive OCF growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
100.00%
Positive FCF growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
414.58%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SLDP's 1291.51%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
445.84%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SLDP's 142.51%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
474.69%
Positive OCF/share growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
639.05%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SLDP is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
368.38%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SLDP is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
117.46%
Positive short-term CAGR while SLDP is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
758.22%
Equity/share CAGR of 758.22% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
113.64%
Positive short-term equity growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
204.81%
Our AR growth while SLDP is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.68%
Positive BV/share change while SLDP is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
6.55%
We have some new debt while SLDP reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.