PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
100.00%
Positive revenue growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
18.63%
Positive gross profit growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
76.71%
Positive EBIT growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
76.71%
Positive operating income growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
100.00%
Positive net income growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
100.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x SLDP's 4.50%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
100.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
3.20%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SLDP's 2514.50%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
3.20%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SLDP's 2215.43%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Positive OCF growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
100.00%
FCF growth above 1.5x SLDP's 1.51%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
120.46%
10Y CAGR of 120.46% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
522.65%
5Y CAGR of 522.65% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
608.72%
3Y CAGR of 608.72% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
9689.57%
OCF/share CAGR of 9689.57% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
692.97%
OCF/share CAGR of 692.97% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
1414.39%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 1414.39% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
219.36%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 219.36% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
1837.97%
Net income/share CAGR of 1837.97% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
6156.15%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 6156.15% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
448.62%
Equity/share CAGR of 448.62% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
95.88%
Equity/share CAGR of 95.88% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.10%
We have a declining book value while SLDP shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
8.49%
Debt growth of 8.49% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.21%
SG&A declining or stable vs. SLDP's 78.44%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.