PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-76.37%
Negative revenue growth while SLDP stands at 32.10%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-60.22%
Negative gross profit growth while SLDP is at 20.69%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-82.23%
Negative EBIT growth while SLDP is at 16.11%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-82.23%
Negative operating income growth while SLDP is at 16.11%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-81.32%
Negative net income growth while SLDP stands at 6.07%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-80.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-80.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
4.62%
Slight or no buybacks while SLDP is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
12.14%
Slight or no buyback while SLDP is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-54.43%
Negative OCF growth while SLDP is at 6.63%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-32.83%
Negative FCF growth while SLDP is at 7.84%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-50.22%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SLDP stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
112.77%
5Y CAGR of 112.77% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
49.41%
3Y CAGR of 49.41% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
4276.79%
OCF/share CAGR of 4276.79% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
457.75%
OCF/share CAGR of 457.75% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
259.99%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 259.99% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
121.31%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 121.31% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
2783.33%
Net income/share CAGR of 2783.33% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
0.58%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 0.58% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
609.64%
Equity/share CAGR of 609.64% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
87.12%
Equity/share CAGR of 87.12% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-76.11%
Firm’s AR is declining while SLDP shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
5.31%
Inventory growth of 5.31% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
1.87%
Asset growth of 1.87% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
-0.88%
We have a declining book value while SLDP shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-13.08%
We’re deleveraging while SLDP stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.81%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.