PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
110.57%
Revenue growth above 1.5x SLDP's 2.45%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
-58.43%
Negative gross profit growth while SLDP is at 42.86%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
61.64%
Positive EBIT growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
61.64%
Positive operating income growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
100.00%
Positive net income growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
100.00%
EPS growth similar to SLDP's 92.15%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
50.00%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of SLDP's 92.32%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
-4.41%
Share reduction while SLDP is at 3271.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
6.04%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SLDP's 3339.73%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Positive OCF growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
100.00%
Positive FCF growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
368.71%
5Y CAGR of 368.71% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
229.13%
3Y CAGR of 229.13% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1067.01%
OCF/share CAGR of 1067.01% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
653.23%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 653.23% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5933.00%
Net income/share CAGR of 5933.00% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
110.45%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 110.45% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
644.83%
Equity/share CAGR of 644.83% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
79.50%
Equity/share CAGR of 79.50% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.00%
Inventory is declining while SLDP stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
0.00%
Asset growth of 0.00% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
4.96%
BV/share growth of 4.96% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
9.21%
Debt growth of 9.21% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-94.11%
We cut SG&A while SLDP invests at 387.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.