PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-62.12%
Negative revenue growth while SLDP stands at 11.94%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-4.76%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-133.92%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-133.92%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-104.47%
Negative net income growth while SLDP stands at 8.88%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-100.00%
Negative EPS growth while SLDP is at 8.86%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-100.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SLDP is at 8.86%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-3.68%
Share reduction while SLDP is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-7.83%
Reduced diluted shares while SLDP is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while SLDP stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
49.89%
Positive OCF growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
180.79%
Positive FCF growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-12.63%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
66.44%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SLDP is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
68.94%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SLDP is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
992.35%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SLDP's 85.42%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
163.21%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SLDP's 85.42%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
1886.98%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SLDP's 85.42%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-158.18%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while SLDP is at 87.55%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-105.95%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while SLDP is 87.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
69.70%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of SLDP's 87.55%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
164.53%
Equity/share CAGR of 164.53% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
90.05%
Equity/share CAGR of 90.05% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-63.41%
Firm’s AR is declining while SLDP shows 66.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-10.39%
Inventory is declining while SLDP stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
9.77%
Asset growth well under 50% of SLDP's 164.74%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
2.75%
Under 50% of SLDP's 132.73%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-13.80%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.29%
We cut SG&A while SLDP invests at 39.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.