PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
100.00%
Revenue growth above 1.5x SLDP's 66.08%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
-88.15%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-493.85%
Negative EBIT growth while SLDP is at 8.94%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-493.85%
Negative operating income growth while SLDP is at 8.94%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-100.00%
Negative net income growth while SLDP stands at 608.36%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.82%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SLDP's 56881.75%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
8.50%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SLDP's 68479.32%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
OCF growth above 1.5x SLDP's 5.97%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
100.00%
Positive FCF growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
220.63%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SLDP is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
225.44%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SLDP is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
407.05%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SLDP's 99.29%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
3727.79%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SLDP's 99.29%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-111.47%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while SLDP is 101.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
41.62%
Below 50% of SLDP's 101.40%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
154.82%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SLDP is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
83.07%
Positive short-term equity growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
416.89%
AR growth well above SLDP's 29.13%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-0.00%
Inventory is declining while SLDP stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
0.00%
Asset growth well under 50% of SLDP's 76.06%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-3.67%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
9.28%
We have some new debt while SLDP reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.46%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.