PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
17.40%
Positive revenue growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
313.44%
Positive gross profit growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
1367.46%
Positive EBIT growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1367.46%
Positive operating income growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
2002.95%
Positive net income growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
1300.00%
Positive EPS growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1300.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
1.23%
Share count expansion well above SLDP's 0.53%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-17.11%
Reduced diluted shares while SLDP is at 0.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
111.33%
Positive OCF growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
282.53%
Positive FCF growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
350.78%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SLDP is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
343.23%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SLDP is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
70.38%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SLDP is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
3628.75%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SLDP's 69.33%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
1723.11%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SLDP's 69.33%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-1.35%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SLDP stands at 69.33%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
550.00%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SLDP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
1250.00%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SLDP is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
170.00%
Positive short-term CAGR while SLDP is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
20909.17%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SLDP's 51.47%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
115.51%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SLDP's 51.47%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
37.12%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of SLDP's 51.47%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
119.77%
Our AR growth while SLDP is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
1178.20%
Inventory growth of 1178.20% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
28.54%
Positive asset growth while SLDP is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
40.45%
Positive BV/share change while SLDP is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-49.27%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-100.00%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
51.29%
SG&A growth well above SLDP's 4.22%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.