PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
100.00%
Positive revenue growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
10.33%
Positive gross profit growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
78.01%
Positive EBIT growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
78.01%
Positive operating income growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
100.00%
Positive net income growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
100.00%
Positive EPS growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
90.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.88%
Share count expansion well above SLDP's 0.06%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.61%
Diluted share count expanding well above SLDP's 0.06%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative OCF growth while SLDP is at 56.93%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-100.08%
Negative FCF growth while SLDP is at 50.86%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
26555.94%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SLDP's 460.89%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
1181.48%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SLDP's 460.89%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
273.22%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of SLDP's 460.89%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
-4108.13%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-13639.91%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-243.07%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
1403.26%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SLDP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
3061.96%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SLDP is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
440.05%
Positive short-term CAGR while SLDP is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
60878.89%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SLDP's 18104.80%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
235.90%
Below 50% of SLDP's 18104.80%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
64.91%
Below 50% of SLDP's 18104.80%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.21%
Our AR growth while SLDP is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.65%
Positive asset growth while SLDP is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-0.87%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
3.31%
We have some new debt while SLDP reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.59%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.