PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
100.00%
Positive revenue growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-124.79%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-100.00%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-100.00%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-87.50%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-87.50%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-1.60%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.60%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
OCF growth above 1.5x SLDP's 61.76%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
99.41%
FCF growth above 1.5x SLDP's 53.01%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
392.46%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SLDP's 1005.86%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
53.67%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SLDP's 1005.86%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
6.84%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SLDP's 753.54%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
1439.43%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
575.55%
Positive OCF/share growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
527.19%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SLDP is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-1424.35%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-482.04%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-453.40%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
4455.09%
Equity/share CAGR of 4455.09% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
136.46%
Equity/share CAGR of 136.46% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
63.14%
Below 50% of SLDP's 239.27%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while SLDP invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.62%
Positive BV/share change while SLDP is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
9.80%
We have some new debt while SLDP reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-45.13%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.