PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
18.54%
Positive revenue growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
870.69%
Positive gross profit growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
184.02%
Positive EBIT growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
184.02%
Positive operating income growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
167.73%
Positive net income growth while SLDP is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
166.67%
EPS growth of 166.67% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
166.67%
Diluted EPS growth of 166.67% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
5.78%
Share count expansion well above SLDP's 0.89%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
4.44%
Diluted share count expanding well above SLDP's 0.89%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.08%
Negative OCF growth while SLDP is at 11.36%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-19.69%
Negative FCF growth while SLDP is at 18.96%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
377.61%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SLDP is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
94.32%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SLDP is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
204.39%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SLDP's 592.64%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
440.27%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SLDP's 82.94%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
90.13%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to SLDP's 82.94%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
154.99%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SLDP is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
525.64%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SLDP's 62.44% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
179.66%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SLDP's 62.44%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
4980.00%
Positive short-term CAGR while SLDP is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1810.25%
Equity/share CAGR of 1810.25% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
133.00%
Equity/share CAGR of 133.00% while SLDP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
79.76%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SLDP's 39.02%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
69.47%
Our AR growth while SLDP is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-25.49%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-2.76%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
13.22%
Positive BV/share change while SLDP is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-24.28%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
71.78%
We expand SG&A while SLDP cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.