PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Positive EBIT growth while XRF.AX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
100.00%
Positive operating income growth while XRF.AX is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
100.00%
Net income growth above 1.5x XRF.AX's 13.78%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
100.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x XRF.AX's 12.54%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
100.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x XRF.AX's 12.54%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-100.00%
Share reduction while XRF.AX is at 1.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while XRF.AX stands at 151.40%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y CAGR while XRF.AX stands at 74.52%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-100.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while XRF.AX stands at 49.22%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
100.00%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of XRF.AX's 132.15%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
100.00%
Below 50% of XRF.AX's 1139.05%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
100.00%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of XRF.AX's 144.47%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
-100.00%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while XRF.AX is at 198.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.