PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.28%
Negative revenue growth while Industrials median is 4.51%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-0.16%
Negative gross profit growth while Industrials median is 3.70%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
7.61%
EBIT growth of 7.61% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
7.61%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Industrials median of 3.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
-14.06%
Negative net income growth while Industrials median is 2.88%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.57%
Share change of 19.57% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
19.57%
Diluted share change of 19.57% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.09%
OCF growth of 30.09% while Industrials is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
26.35%
FCF growth of 26.35% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
424.83%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Industrials median of 35.52%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
-91.33%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Industrials median is 18.99%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-48.01%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Industrials median is 21.01%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
93.13%
OCF/share CAGR of 93.13% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-121.25%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-111.18%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Industrials median is 51.54%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.62%
R&D dropping while Industrials median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-310.53%
SG&A decline while Industrials grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.