0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.95%
Diluted share reduction while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2963.60%
Negative OCF growth while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-174.00%
Negative FCF growth while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-92.95%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Industrials median is 17.01%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-67.73%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Industrials median is 8.60%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-68.10%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Industrials median is 10.91%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-101.31%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
94.53%
OCF/share CAGR of 94.53% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-112.81%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-111.55%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Industrials median of 61.47%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
81.82%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Industrials median of 23.76%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
19.58%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of Industrials median. John Neff would seek cost or revenue improvements to match peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.88%
AR shrinking while Industrials median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-1.24%
Decreasing inventory while Industrials is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-9.00%
Assets shrink while Industrials median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Debt is shrinking while Industrials median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.