PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1725.48%
Positive revenue growth while Industrials median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
2308.06%
Positive gross profit growth while Industrials median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
51.14%
Positive EBIT growth while Industrials median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong competitive advantage in operations.
51.14%
Positive operating income growth while Industrials is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
37.21%
Positive net income growth while Industrials median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.82%
Share reduction while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-18.99%
Diluted share reduction while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.04%
OCF growth of 45.04% while Industrials is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
14.87%
FCF growth of 14.87% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-89.32%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Industrials median is 18.20%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-78.78%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Industrials median is 14.76%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-70.24%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Industrials median is 8.26%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-45.41%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
580.42%
3Y OCF/share growth of 580.42% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-101.15%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Industrials median of 54.73%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
23.00%
Below 50% of Industrials median. Jim Chanos would suspect deeper problems limiting mid-term profit potential.
87.68%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Industrials median of 11.98%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.84%
AR shrinking while Industrials median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
7.77%
Inventory growth far above Industrials median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
0.48%
Asset growth of 0.48% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
1432.90%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Industrials median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
6.03%
Debt growth of 6.03% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-50.09%
R&D dropping while Industrials median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
145.68%
SG&A growth of 145.68% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.