PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
28.15%
Positive revenue growth while Industrials median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
27.22%
Positive gross profit growth while Industrials median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
334.31%
Positive EBIT growth while Industrials median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong competitive advantage in operations.
334.31%
Positive operating income growth while Industrials is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
2587.67%
Positive net income growth while Industrials median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.50%
Share reduction while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-18.95%
Diluted share reduction while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-76.36%
Negative OCF growth while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-78.87%
Negative FCF growth while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-73.52%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Industrials median is 20.62%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-53.52%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Industrials median is 12.01%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
8.11%
3Y revenue/share growth 1.25-1.5x Industrials median of 7.16%. Mohnish Pabrai would attribute it to strong near-term market positioning.
112.96%
OCF/share CAGR of 112.96% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
374.44%
OCF/share CAGR of 374.44% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
298.40%
3Y OCF/share growth of 298.40% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
124.44%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Industrials median of 53.04% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
130.79%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Industrials median of 24.22%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
183.33%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Industrials median of 18.50%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4378.96%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Industrials median of 13.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
165.91%
AR growth of 165.91% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
6.12%
Inventory growth far above Industrials median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
12.43%
We expand assets while Industrials is negative. Peter Lynch sees a possible advantage if expansions align with profitable markets or a recovering cycle.
116.00%
Positive BV/share change while Industrials median is negative. Peter Lynch finds a strong advantage vs. peers failing to expand equity.
-45.25%
Debt is shrinking while Industrials median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-50.01%
R&D dropping while Industrials median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
6.62%
SG&A growth of 6.62% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.