0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
22.39%
Positive revenue growth while Industrials median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
9.26%
Positive gross profit growth while Industrials median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
-4.78%
Negative EBIT growth while Industrials median is -0.70%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-4.78%
Negative operating income growth while Industrials median is -3.11%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-45.78%
Negative net income growth while Industrials median is -1.32%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-50.00%
Negative EPS growth while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-50.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-6.74%
Share reduction while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-6.33%
Diluted share reduction while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-124.17%
Negative OCF growth while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
37.44%
FCF growth of 37.44% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-67.18%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Industrials median is 28.15%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
1.70%
Below 50% of Industrials median. Jim Chanos would suspect structural disadvantages or a higher share base limiting per-share growth.
23.51%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Industrials median of 12.52%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
88.10%
OCF/share CAGR of 88.10% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-117.41%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-124.87%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
106.06%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Industrials median. Mohnish Pabrai would confirm that management’s capital allocation strategy drives the outperformance.
133.33%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Industrials median of 47.94%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
100.00%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Industrials median of 23.94%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9648.54%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Industrials median of 30.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
260.24%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Industrials median of 15.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.39%
AR growth of 4.39% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-11.17%
Decreasing inventory while Industrials is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
0.02%
Asset growth of 0.02% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
13.30%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Industrials median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
2.27%
Debt growth of 2.27% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-100.00%
R&D dropping while Industrials median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
17.47%
SG&A growth of 17.47% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.