PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-16.32%
Negative revenue growth while Industrials median is 0.87%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-14.32%
Negative gross profit growth while Industrials median is 0.39%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-67.18%
Negative EBIT growth while Industrials median is 2.20%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-67.18%
Negative operating income growth while Industrials median is 3.20%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-175.62%
Negative net income growth while Industrials median is 4.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-200.00%
Negative EPS growth while Industrials median is 3.84%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-200.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Industrials median is 3.99%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
14.57%
Share change of 14.57% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
13.52%
Diluted share change of 13.52% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
135.18%
OCF growth of 135.18% while Industrials is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
107.63%
FCF growth of 107.63% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-77.23%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Industrials median is 24.45%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-9.90%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Industrials median is 19.33%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
36.51%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Industrials median of 13.10%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
-89.51%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-58.37%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-87.67%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
49.18%
Net income/share CAGR 50-75% of Industrials median. Guy Spier would see lagging competitiveness in core profitability.
-32.00%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Industrials median is 42.65%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-1200.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Industrials median is 24.78%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25549.17%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Industrials median of 23.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
265.66%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Industrials median of 14.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-77.83%
AR shrinking while Industrials median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
49.04%
Inventory growth far above Industrials median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
5.45%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Industrials median of 0.35%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
-22.22%
Negative BV/share change while Industrials median is 0.74%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
0.16%
Debt growth of 0.16% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
55.65%
R&D growth of 55.65% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
15.36%
SG&A growth of 15.36% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.