PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-35.79%
Negative revenue growth while Industrials median is -2.44%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
987.72%
Positive gross profit growth while Industrials median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
165.89%
EBIT growth of 165.89% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
165.89%
Positive operating income growth while Industrials is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
479.74%
Positive net income growth while Industrials median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.46%
Share reduction while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-2.46%
Diluted share reduction while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-163.38%
Negative OCF growth while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-201.42%
Negative FCF growth while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
10.79%
10Y revenue/share CAGR below 50% of Industrials median of 30.92%. Jim Chanos would suspect deep structural or market share issues.
119.97%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Industrials median of 18.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
-28.44%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Industrials median is 8.43%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-1016.95%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-462.70%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-47.31%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
336.32%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Industrials median of 59.86% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
1037.50%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Industrials median of 29.50%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
-62.50%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Industrials median is 20.99%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.31%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Industrials median of 31.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
55.73%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Industrials median of 18.46%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.72%
AR growth of 22.72% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
30.13%
Inventory growth far above Industrials median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
-0.81%
Assets shrink while Industrials median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
8.82%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Industrials median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-10.95%
Debt is shrinking while Industrials median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-100.00%
R&D dropping while Industrials median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
133.02%
SG&A growth of 133.02% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.