PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-82.06%
Negative revenue growth while Industrials median is -5.08%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-66.00%
Negative gross profit growth while Industrials median is -3.85%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-123.40%
Negative EBIT growth while Industrials median is -5.81%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-123.40%
Negative operating income growth while Industrials median is -5.86%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-139.08%
Negative net income growth while Industrials median is -5.06%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-140.00%
Negative EPS growth while Industrials median is -4.26%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-142.11%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Industrials median is -4.24%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
1.85%
Share change of 1.85% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
-0.12%
Diluted share reduction while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
129.64%
Positive OCF growth while Industrials median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong relative advantage in operational efficiency.
120.13%
FCF growth of 120.13% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
142.30%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Industrials median of 28.48%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
-24.58%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Industrials median is 17.13%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
13.36%
3Y revenue/share growth 50-75% of Industrials median of 19.30%. Guy Spier might worry about a waning short-term advantage.
657.42%
OCF/share CAGR of 657.42% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
333.39%
OCF/share CAGR of 333.39% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
565.52%
3Y OCF/share growth of 565.52% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-650.00%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Industrials median of 48.68%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-287.50%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Industrials median is 30.43%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-475.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Industrials median is 17.29%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
4382.33%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Industrials median of 44.26% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
132.10%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Industrials median of 26.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
73.11%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Industrials median of 18.34%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reductions while Industrials median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
-41.70%
AR shrinking while Industrials median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
4.93%
Inventory growth far above Industrials median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
-9.39%
Assets shrink while Industrials median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-11.60%
Negative BV/share change while Industrials median is 0.63%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-63.18%
Debt is shrinking while Industrials median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-100.00%
R&D dropping while Industrials median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-1.16%
SG&A decline while Industrials grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.