0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-100.00%
Revenue decline while ANO.AX shows 62.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-100.00%
Gross profit decline while ANO.AX shows 251.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-100.00%
Margin decline while ANO.AX shows 117.07% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while ANO.AX shows 55.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
100.00%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x ANO.AX's 0.76%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Operating expenses reduction while ANO.AX shows 10.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
D&A reduction while ANO.AX shows 129.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-100.00%
EBITDA decline while ANO.AX shows 220.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
EBITDA margin decline while ANO.AX shows 174.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
Operating income decline while ANO.AX shows 648.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
Operating margin decline while ANO.AX shows 438.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while ANO.AX shows 40.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Pre-tax income decline while ANO.AX shows 160.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
Pre-tax margin decline while ANO.AX shows 137.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
Tax expense reduction while ANO.AX shows 155.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Net income decline while ANO.AX shows 161.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
Net margin decline while ANO.AX shows 138.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
EPS decline while ANO.AX shows 161.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
Diluted EPS decline while ANO.AX shows 161.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
Share count reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.62% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.