0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.36%
Growth of 5.36% while ANO.AX shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
-5.97%
Cost reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
15.75%
Growth of 15.75% while ANO.AX shows flat gross profit. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
9.86%
Margin change of 9.86% while ANO.AX shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.08%
G&A reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-47.53%
Marketing expense reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-47.28%
Operating expenses reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-19.41%
Total costs reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-95.57%
Interest expense reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
118.15%
D&A change of 118.15% while ANO.AX maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-108.48%
EBITDA decline while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-108.05%
EBITDA margin decline while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
34.85%
Income change of 34.85% while ANO.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
38.17%
Margin change of 38.17% while ANO.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-73.12%
Other expenses reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-89.84%
Pre-tax income decline while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-90.35%
Pre-tax margin decline while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-89.84%
Tax expense reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Net income decline while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
Net margin decline while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
EPS decline while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
Diluted EPS decline while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
69.26%
Share count change of 69.26% while ANO.AX is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
46.43%
Diluted share change of 46.43% while ANO.AX is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.