0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
27.60%
Similar revenue growth to ANO.AX's 34.63%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
62.36%
Cost growth less than half of ANO.AX's 278.51%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
1.69%
Positive growth while ANO.AX shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-20.30%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
25.51%
R&D growth while ANO.AX reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
17.42%
G&A growth less than half of ANO.AX's 38.52%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
-22.73%
Marketing expense reduction while ANO.AX shows 296.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.39%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
48.37%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ANO.AX's 14.59%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
69.57%
Interest expense growth while ANO.AX reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
24.28%
D&A growth while ANO.AX reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-85.01%
EBITDA decline while ANO.AX shows 8.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-44.99%
EBITDA margin decline while ANO.AX shows 31.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-46.76%
Operating income decline while ANO.AX shows 6.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.02%
Operating margin decline while ANO.AX shows 30.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-51.10%
Other expenses reduction while ANO.AX shows 157.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-325.04%
Pre-tax income decline while ANO.AX shows 14.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-276.37%
Pre-tax margin decline while ANO.AX shows 36.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-325.04%
Tax expense reduction while ANO.AX shows 14.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.15%
Share count increase while ANO.AX reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
26.15%
Diluted share increase while ANO.AX reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.