PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.10%
Revenue growth 50-75% of ANO.AX's 19.64%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
21.60%
Cost growth 1.1-1.25x ANO.AX's 18.10%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of cost control initiatives.
5.36%
Gross profit growth below 50% of ANO.AX's 23.80%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-7.66%
Margin decline while ANO.AX shows 3.48% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-20.46%
R&D reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
5.14%
G&A growth less than half of ANO.AX's 19.95%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
128.42%
Operating expenses growth less than half of ANO.AX's 762.94%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
32.31%
Total costs growth 50-75% of ANO.AX's 62.86%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
130.23%
Interest expense growth while ANO.AX reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.27%
D&A growth while ANO.AX reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-224.28%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-184.21%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-35.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.32%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-128.87%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-101.98%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-77.02%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-81.90%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-109.89%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-83.95%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-70.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-70.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
24.12%
Share count change of 24.12% while ANO.AX is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
24.12%
Diluted share change of 24.12% while ANO.AX is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.