Rectifier Technologies Limited (RFT.AX)

0.000.00 (0.00%)

Rectifier Technologies Limited (RFT.AX) stock comprehensive Income Growth Analysis including revenue, gross profit, operating profit, net profit, EPS, and other financial metrics. Compare income growth against peers/competitors, industry and sector standards.

High Bankruptcy RiskModerate ProfitabilityModerate EfficiencyModerate GrowthLow QualityAdequate Dividend ProfileIndustry Rank: 95.17%Sector Rank: 92.43%

ASX - Industrials - Electrical Equipment & Parts | Market Cap: 5.53M | Next Earnings Date: 28 Aug 2025

Day's Range

0.00 - 0.01

52-Week Range

0.00 - 0.02

Volume

289 / 496.9K (Avg.)

Trending:

RFT.AX Income Growth Analysis - Compare Against ANO.AX

Evaluation Basis

Value Investing Sector Medians Industry Medians

Select Period

2025 (Q2)2025 (Q1)2024 (Q4)2024 (Q3)2024 (Q2)2024 (Q1)2023 (Q4)2023 (Q3)

Comparison against ANO.AX

None 010120.KS SLDP PLUG ECL.AX LBL.AX

Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.

Revenue Growth

-100.00%

Revenue decline while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.

Cost of Revenue Growth

-100.00%

Cost reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.

Gross Profit Growth

-100.00%

Gross profit decline while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.

Gross Margin Ratio Growth

-100.00%

Margin decline while ANO.AX shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.

R&D Expenses Growth

-100.00%

R&D reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.

G&A Expenses Growth

-100.00%

G&A reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.

Selling & Marketing Expenses Growth

100.00%

Marketing expense change of 100.00% while ANO.AX maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.

Other Expenses Growth

No Data

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Operating Expenses Growth

-100.00%

Operating expenses reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.

Total Costs & Expenses Growth

-100.00%

Total costs reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.

Interest Expense Growth

-100.00%

Interest expense reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.

Depreciation & Amortization Growth

-100.00%

D&A reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.

EBITDA Growth

100.00%

EBITDA change of 100.00% while ANO.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.

EBITDA Margin Growth

100.00%

EBITDA margin growth while ANO.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.

Operating Income Growth

100.00%

Income change of 100.00% while ANO.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.

Operating Margin Growth

100.00%

Operating margin growth while ANO.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.

Other Income/Expenses Growth

100.00%

Other expenses change of 100.00% while ANO.AX maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.

Pre-Tax Income Growth

100.00%

Income change of 100.00% while ANO.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.

Pre-Tax Margin Growth

100.00%

Pre-tax margin growth while ANO.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.

Income Tax Expense Growth

-100.00%

Tax expense reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.

Net Income Growth

100.00%

Income change of 100.00% while ANO.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.

Net Margin Growth

100.00%

Net margin growth while ANO.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.

EPS Growth

100.00%

EPS change of 100.00% while ANO.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.

Diluted EPS Growth

100.00%

Diluted EPS change of 100.00% while ANO.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.

Share Count Growth (Basic)

-100.00%

Share count reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.

Share Count Growth (Diluted)

0.07%

Diluted share change of 0.07% while ANO.AX is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.

Select Chart Metric:

RFT.AX Income Growth Analysis - Compare Against ANO.AX

Evaluation Basis

Value Investing Sector Medians Industry Medians

Select Period

2025 (Q2)2025 (Q1)2024 (Q4)2024 (Q3)2024 (Q2)2024 (Q1)2023 (Q4)2023 (Q3)

Comparison against ANO.AX

None 010120.KS SLDP PLUG ECL.AX LBL.AX

Revenue Growth

-100.00%

Revenue decline while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.

Cost of Revenue Growth

-100.00%

Cost reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.

Gross Profit Growth

-100.00%

Gross profit decline while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.

Gross Margin Ratio Growth

-100.00%

Margin decline while ANO.AX shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.

R&D Expenses Growth

-100.00%

R&D reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.

G&A Expenses Growth

-100.00%

G&A reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.

Selling & Marketing Expenses Growth

100.00%

Marketing expense change of 100.00% while ANO.AX maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.

Other Expenses Growth

No Data

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Operating Expenses Growth

-100.00%

Operating expenses reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.

Total Costs & Expenses Growth

-100.00%

Total costs reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.

Interest Expense Growth

-100.00%

Interest expense reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.

Depreciation & Amortization Growth

-100.00%

D&A reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.

EBITDA Growth

100.00%

EBITDA change of 100.00% while ANO.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.

EBITDA Margin Growth

100.00%

EBITDA margin growth while ANO.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.

Operating Income Growth

100.00%

Income change of 100.00% while ANO.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.

Operating Margin Growth

100.00%

Operating margin growth while ANO.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.

Other Income/Expenses Growth

100.00%

Other expenses change of 100.00% while ANO.AX maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.

Pre-Tax Income Growth

100.00%

Income change of 100.00% while ANO.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.

Pre-Tax Margin Growth

100.00%

Pre-tax margin growth while ANO.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.

Income Tax Expense Growth

-100.00%

Tax expense reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.

Net Income Growth

100.00%

Income change of 100.00% while ANO.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.

Net Margin Growth

100.00%

Net margin growth while ANO.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.

EPS Growth

100.00%

EPS change of 100.00% while ANO.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.

Diluted EPS Growth

100.00%

Diluted EPS change of 100.00% while ANO.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.

Share Count Growth (Basic)

-100.00%

Share count reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.

Share Count Growth (Diluted)

0.07%

Diluted share change of 0.07% while ANO.AX is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.

Select Chart Metric: