PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
15.92%
Positive growth while ANO.AX shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.84%
Cost growth less than half of ANO.AX's 9.31%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
36.21%
Positive growth while ANO.AX shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
17.50%
Margin expansion while ANO.AX shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-9.08%
R&D reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-7.18%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
1.60%
Marketing expense growth less than half of ANO.AX's 921.03%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.69%
Operating expenses reduction while ANO.AX shows 453.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.27%
Total costs reduction while ANO.AX shows 150.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
62.25%
Interest expense growth while ANO.AX reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-48.53%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
126.21%
EBITDA growth while ANO.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
122.61%
EBITDA margin growth while ANO.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
87.48%
Operating income growth while ANO.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
89.20%
Operating margin growth while ANO.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
234.91%
Similar other expenses growth to ANO.AX's 275.33%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
96.09%
Pre-tax income growth while ANO.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
96.63%
Pre-tax margin growth while ANO.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.13%
Tax expense growth less than half of ANO.AX's 241.40%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
91.33%
Net income growth while ANO.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
92.52%
Net margin growth while ANO.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
94.12%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x ANO.AX's 3.98%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
94.12%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x ANO.AX's 3.98%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
10.11%
Share count reduction below 50% of ANO.AX's 7.91%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
10.11%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of ANO.AX's 7.91%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.