PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.91%
Revenue decline while ANO.AX shows 20.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-2.68%
Cost reduction while ANO.AX shows 1.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-5.14%
Gross profit decline while ANO.AX shows 115.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.27%
Margin decline while ANO.AX shows 79.61% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-3.79%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
2.54%
G&A growth while ANO.AX reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-4.34%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.99%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-3.63%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-2.56%
Interest expense reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-16.14%
D&A reduction while ANO.AX shows 228.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-129.18%
EBITDA decline while ANO.AX shows 51.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-130.37%
EBITDA margin decline while ANO.AX shows 59.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-174.91%
Operating income decline while ANO.AX shows 38.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-186.11%
Operating margin decline while ANO.AX shows 48.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
13.13%
Other expenses growth while ANO.AX reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-501.03%
Pre-tax income decline while ANO.AX shows 31.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-525.51%
Pre-tax margin decline while ANO.AX shows 43.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-53.45%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-187.26%
Net income decline while ANO.AX shows 134.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-198.96%
Net margin decline while ANO.AX shows 128.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-300.00%
EPS decline while ANO.AX shows 130.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-300.00%
Diluted EPS decline while ANO.AX shows 130.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.