0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-19.26%
Revenue decline while ANO.AX shows 21.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-18.42%
Cost reduction while ANO.AX shows 45.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-20.12%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.06%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
137.94%
R&D growth while ANO.AX reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-16.63%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
14.83%
Marketing expense growth while ANO.AX reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
58.23%
Operating expenses growth less than half of ANO.AX's 289.85%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-9.20%
Total costs reduction while ANO.AX shows 60.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-38.80%
Interest expense reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-49.56%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-952.72%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1203.88%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-99.81%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-147.48%
Operating margin decline while ANO.AX shows 17.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-78.73%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-167.56%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-231.39%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-168.18%
Tax expense reduction while ANO.AX shows 205.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-136.77%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-193.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
8.80%
Share count reduction below 50% of ANO.AX's 11.59%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
8.80%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of ANO.AX's 11.59%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.