PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.76%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-11.58%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
1.59%
Positive growth while ANO.AX shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.66%
Margin expansion while ANO.AX shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.30%
R&D growth less than half of ANO.AX's 5711.71%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-1.72%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-4.72%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.56%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-12.26%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-9.62%
Interest expense reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-12.43%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-62.15%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-60.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
59.24%
Operating income growth while ANO.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
57.21%
Operating margin growth while ANO.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-70.33%
Other expenses reduction while ANO.AX shows 839.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-113.45%
Pre-tax income decline while ANO.AX shows 12.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-114.12%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-483.62%
Tax expense reduction while ANO.AX shows 839.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-96.52%
Net income decline while ANO.AX shows 12.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-96.35%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.93%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ANO.AX's 124.15%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
1.93%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ANO.AX's 124.15%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.