0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-100.00%
Revenue decline while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-100.00%
Cost reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-100.00%
Gross profit decline while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-100.00%
Margin decline while ANO.AX shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-100.00%
R&D reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
100.00%
Marketing expense change of 100.00% while ANO.AX maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Operating expenses reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Total costs reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
D&A reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-100.00%
EBITDA decline while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
100.00%
Income change of 100.00% while ANO.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
100.00%
Operating margin growth while ANO.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
100.00%
Income change of 100.00% while ANO.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
100.00%
Pre-tax margin growth while ANO.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
Tax expense change of 100.00% while ANO.AX maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
-100.00%
Net income decline while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Share count reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.35%
Diluted share reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.