PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.00%
Growth of 9.00% while ANO.AX shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
9.32%
Cost growth of 9.32% while ANO.AX maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
8.77%
Growth of 8.77% while ANO.AX shows flat gross profit. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
-0.21%
Margin decline while ANO.AX shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.23%
Operating expenses reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.29%
Total costs reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.50%
D&A reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
80.14%
EBITDA change of 80.14% while ANO.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
81.78%
Margin change of 81.78% while ANO.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
75.69%
Income change of 75.69% while ANO.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
77.70%
Margin change of 77.70% while ANO.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
98.33%
Other expenses change of 98.33% while ANO.AX maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
78.01%
Income change of 78.01% while ANO.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
79.83%
Margin change of 79.83% while ANO.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-70.41%
Tax expense reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
77.97%
Income change of 77.97% while ANO.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
79.78%
Margin change of 79.78% while ANO.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
100.00%
EPS change of 100.00% while ANO.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
66.67%
Diluted EPS change of 66.67% while ANO.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
31.77%
Share count change of 31.77% while ANO.AX is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
9.28%
Diluted share change of 9.28% while ANO.AX is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.