PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-19.18%
Revenue decline while ANO.AX shows 62.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
13.05%
Cost increase while ANO.AX reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-35.15%
Gross profit decline while ANO.AX shows 251.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-19.76%
Margin decline while ANO.AX shows 117.07% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-50.02%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.47%
Operating expenses reduction while ANO.AX shows 10.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.64%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.72%
D&A growth less than half of ANO.AX's 129.13%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-2.05%
EBITDA decline while ANO.AX shows 220.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
21.20%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ANO.AX's 174.05%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.26%
Operating income decline while ANO.AX shows 648.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
20.94%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ANO.AX's 438.47%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
621.29%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x ANO.AX's 40.19%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-73.98%
Pre-tax income decline while ANO.AX shows 160.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-67.81%
Pre-tax margin decline while ANO.AX shows 137.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-60.17%
Tax expense reduction while ANO.AX shows 155.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-74.84%
Net income decline while ANO.AX shows 161.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-68.87%
Net margin decline while ANO.AX shows 138.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-50.00%
EPS decline while ANO.AX shows 161.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-50.00%
Diluted EPS decline while ANO.AX shows 161.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.50%
Share count reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.62% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-18.24%
Diluted share reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.46% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.