0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.34%
Revenue growth below 50% of ANO.AX's 62.13%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-26.28%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
41.98%
Gross profit growth below 50% of ANO.AX's 251.94%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
28.67%
Margin expansion below 50% of ANO.AX's 117.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
100.04%
R&D growth while ANO.AX reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
52.65%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ANO.AX's 10.05%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
14.21%
Total costs growth while ANO.AX reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.76%
D&A growth less than half of ANO.AX's 129.13%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-153.95%
EBITDA decline while ANO.AX shows 220.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-148.89%
EBITDA margin decline while ANO.AX shows 174.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-161.22%
Operating income decline while ANO.AX shows 648.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-155.48%
Operating margin decline while ANO.AX shows 438.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
895.41%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x ANO.AX's 40.19%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-73.92%
Pre-tax income decline while ANO.AX shows 160.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-76.37%
Pre-tax margin decline while ANO.AX shows 137.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.63%
Tax expense reduction while ANO.AX shows 155.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-79.96%
Net income decline while ANO.AX shows 161.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-81.84%
Net margin decline while ANO.AX shows 138.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
EPS decline while ANO.AX shows 161.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
Diluted EPS decline while ANO.AX shows 161.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
66.97%
Share count reduction below 50% of ANO.AX's 0.62%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
32.89%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of ANO.AX's 0.46%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.