PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-19.65%
Revenue decline while ANO.AX shows 62.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-22.29%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-18.11%
Gross profit decline while ANO.AX shows 251.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.91%
Margin expansion below 50% of ANO.AX's 117.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.05%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ANO.AX's 10.05%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
2.73%
Total costs growth while ANO.AX reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.87%
D&A growth less than half of ANO.AX's 129.13%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-130.82%
EBITDA decline while ANO.AX shows 220.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-138.36%
EBITDA margin decline while ANO.AX shows 174.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-140.60%
Operating income decline while ANO.AX shows 648.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-150.53%
Operating margin decline while ANO.AX shows 438.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.06%
Other expenses reduction while ANO.AX shows 40.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-122.42%
Pre-tax income decline while ANO.AX shows 160.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-127.90%
Pre-tax margin decline while ANO.AX shows 137.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-74.46%
Tax expense reduction while ANO.AX shows 155.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-103.99%
Net income decline while ANO.AX shows 161.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-104.96%
Net margin decline while ANO.AX shows 138.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
EPS decline while ANO.AX shows 161.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
Diluted EPS decline while ANO.AX shows 161.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.26%
Share count reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.62% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-12.92%
Diluted share reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.46% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.