0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-16.32%
Revenue decline while ANO.AX shows 62.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-20.95%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-14.32%
Gross profit decline while ANO.AX shows 251.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
2.39%
Margin expansion below 50% of ANO.AX's 117.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
55.65%
R&D growth while ANO.AX reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
200.00%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x ANO.AX's 0.76%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.37%
Operating expenses reduction while ANO.AX shows 10.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.60%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
52.17%
D&A growth less than half of ANO.AX's 129.13%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-76.91%
EBITDA decline while ANO.AX shows 220.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-44.81%
EBITDA margin decline while ANO.AX shows 174.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-67.18%
Operating income decline while ANO.AX shows 648.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-60.78%
Operating margin decline while ANO.AX shows 438.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2563.31%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x ANO.AX's 40.19%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-74.87%
Pre-tax income decline while ANO.AX shows 160.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-69.97%
Pre-tax margin decline while ANO.AX shows 137.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
151.05%
Similar tax expense growth to ANO.AX's 155.30%. Walter Schloss would investigate patterns.
-175.62%
Net income decline while ANO.AX shows 161.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-190.36%
Net margin decline while ANO.AX shows 138.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-200.00%
EPS decline while ANO.AX shows 161.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-200.00%
Diluted EPS decline while ANO.AX shows 161.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
14.57%
Share count reduction below 50% of ANO.AX's 0.62%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
13.52%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of ANO.AX's 0.46%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.