PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-37.63%
Revenue decline while ANO.AX shows 62.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-72.84%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
147.04%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of ANO.AX's 251.94%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
296.08%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x ANO.AX's 117.07%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while ANO.AX shows 55.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
100.00%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x ANO.AX's 0.76%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
63.96%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ANO.AX's 10.05%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-41.86%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-19.23%
D&A reduction while ANO.AX shows 129.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-11.20%
EBITDA decline while ANO.AX shows 220.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
35.39%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ANO.AX's 174.05%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-15.19%
Operating income decline while ANO.AX shows 648.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
35.98%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ANO.AX's 438.47%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-284.25%
Other expenses reduction while ANO.AX shows 40.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-35.90%
Pre-tax income decline while ANO.AX shows 160.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.77%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of ANO.AX's 137.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-38.92%
Tax expense reduction while ANO.AX shows 155.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-33.61%
Net income decline while ANO.AX shows 161.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.45%
Net margin growth below 50% of ANO.AX's 138.06%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-28.57%
EPS decline while ANO.AX shows 161.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-28.57%
Diluted EPS decline while ANO.AX shows 161.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.98%
Share count reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.62% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-6.20%
Diluted share reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.46% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.