0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-76.37%
Revenue decline while ANO.AX shows 62.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-86.12%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-60.22%
Gross profit decline while ANO.AX shows 251.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
68.37%
Margin expansion 50-75% of ANO.AX's 117.07%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.91%
Operating expenses reduction while ANO.AX shows 10.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-76.05%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-87.57%
D&A reduction while ANO.AX shows 129.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-84.58%
EBITDA decline while ANO.AX shows 220.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.96%
EBITDA margin decline while ANO.AX shows 174.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-82.23%
Operating income decline while ANO.AX shows 648.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.78%
Operating margin decline while ANO.AX shows 438.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
320.37%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x ANO.AX's 40.19%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-81.60%
Pre-tax income decline while ANO.AX shows 160.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.12%
Pre-tax margin decline while ANO.AX shows 137.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-82.00%
Tax expense reduction while ANO.AX shows 155.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-81.32%
Net income decline while ANO.AX shows 161.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.94%
Net margin decline while ANO.AX shows 138.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-80.00%
EPS decline while ANO.AX shows 161.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-80.00%
Diluted EPS decline while ANO.AX shows 161.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.62%
Share count reduction below 50% of ANO.AX's 0.62%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
12.14%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of ANO.AX's 0.46%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.