PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
110.57%
Growth of 110.57% while ANO.AX shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
402.59%
Cost growth of 402.59% while ANO.AX maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
-58.43%
Gross profit decline while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-80.26%
Margin decline while ANO.AX shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-93.50%
Operating expenses reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
128.66%
Total costs change of 128.66% while ANO.AX maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
917.31%
D&A change of 917.31% while ANO.AX maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
205.31%
EBITDA change of 205.31% while ANO.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
5.08%
Margin change of 5.08% while ANO.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
61.64%
Income change of 61.64% while ANO.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-23.24%
Operating margin decline while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-69.54%
Other expenses reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
100.00%
Income change of 100.00% while ANO.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-5.02%
Pre-tax margin decline while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
100.00%
Tax expense change of 100.00% while ANO.AX maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
100.00%
Income change of 100.00% while ANO.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-5.02%
Net margin decline while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
100.00%
EPS change of 100.00% while ANO.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
50.00%
Diluted EPS change of 50.00% while ANO.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-4.41%
Share count reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
6.04%
Diluted share change of 6.04% while ANO.AX is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.