PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-37.13%
Revenue decline while ANO.AX shows 62.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-74.72%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
225.85%
Similar gross profit growth to ANO.AX's 251.94%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
418.31%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x ANO.AX's 117.07%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2218.01%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ANO.AX's 10.05%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-38.72%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-52.61%
D&A reduction while ANO.AX shows 129.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-51.79%
EBITDA decline while ANO.AX shows 220.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.81%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ANO.AX's 174.05%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-24.46%
Operating income decline while ANO.AX shows 648.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
20.15%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ANO.AX's 438.47%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-116.03%
Other expenses reduction while ANO.AX shows 40.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-50.36%
Pre-tax income decline while ANO.AX shows 160.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.04%
Pre-tax margin decline while ANO.AX shows 137.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-65.52%
Tax expense reduction while ANO.AX shows 155.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-40.11%
Net income decline while ANO.AX shows 161.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.74%
Net margin decline while ANO.AX shows 138.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-50.00%
EPS decline while ANO.AX shows 161.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-33.33%
Diluted EPS decline while ANO.AX shows 161.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.39%
Share count reduction below 50% of ANO.AX's 0.62%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-8.85%
Diluted share reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.46% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.