0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-62.12%
Revenue decline while ANO.AX shows 62.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-79.83%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-4.76%
Gross profit decline while ANO.AX shows 251.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
151.40%
Margin expansion 1.25-1.5x ANO.AX's 117.07%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.89%
Operating expenses growth less than half of ANO.AX's 10.05%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-62.84%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-91.91%
D&A reduction while ANO.AX shows 129.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-105.08%
EBITDA decline while ANO.AX shows 220.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-131.06%
EBITDA margin decline while ANO.AX shows 174.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-133.92%
Operating income decline while ANO.AX shows 648.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-189.55%
Operating margin decline while ANO.AX shows 438.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
931.60%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x ANO.AX's 40.19%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-87.28%
Pre-tax income decline while ANO.AX shows 160.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-66.43%
Pre-tax margin decline while ANO.AX shows 137.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-43.08%
Tax expense reduction while ANO.AX shows 155.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-104.47%
Net income decline while ANO.AX shows 161.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-111.79%
Net margin decline while ANO.AX shows 138.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
EPS decline while ANO.AX shows 161.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
Diluted EPS decline while ANO.AX shows 161.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.68%
Share count reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.62% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-7.83%
Diluted share reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.46% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.