PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-37.40%
Revenue decline while ANO.AX shows 62.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-69.63%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
129.53%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of ANO.AX's 251.94%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
266.67%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x ANO.AX's 117.07%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.82%
G&A growth 50-75% of ANO.AX's 55.62%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine operational efficiency.
104.96%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x ANO.AX's 0.76%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.84%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ANO.AX's 10.05%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-42.89%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-89.14%
D&A reduction while ANO.AX shows 129.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-59.13%
EBITDA decline while ANO.AX shows 220.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.83%
EBITDA margin decline while ANO.AX shows 174.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
556.16%
Similar operating income growth to ANO.AX's 648.74%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
948.22%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x ANO.AX's 438.47%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-37.78%
Other expenses reduction while ANO.AX shows 40.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-41.00%
Pre-tax income decline while ANO.AX shows 160.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.75%
Pre-tax margin decline while ANO.AX shows 137.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
77.61%
Tax expense growth less than half of ANO.AX's 155.30%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-88.90%
Net income decline while ANO.AX shows 161.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-82.26%
Net margin decline while ANO.AX shows 138.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
EPS decline while ANO.AX shows 161.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
Diluted EPS decline while ANO.AX shows 161.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
306.15%
Share count reduction below 50% of ANO.AX's 0.62%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
9.27%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of ANO.AX's 0.46%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.