PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-47.69%
Revenue decline while ANO.AX shows 62.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-69.34%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
0.48%
Gross profit growth below 50% of ANO.AX's 251.94%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
92.09%
Similar margin change to ANO.AX's 117.07%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry pricing power.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.16%
G&A growth 50-75% of ANO.AX's 55.62%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine operational efficiency.
103.68%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x ANO.AX's 0.76%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
179.46%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ANO.AX's 10.05%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-45.77%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-67.74%
D&A reduction while ANO.AX shows 129.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-49.89%
EBITDA decline while ANO.AX shows 220.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.24%
EBITDA margin decline while ANO.AX shows 174.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-48.14%
Operating income decline while ANO.AX shows 648.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.85%
Operating margin decline while ANO.AX shows 438.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-948.97%
Other expenses reduction while ANO.AX shows 40.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-53.21%
Pre-tax income decline while ANO.AX shows 160.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.54%
Pre-tax margin decline while ANO.AX shows 137.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.82%
Tax expense growth less than half of ANO.AX's 155.30%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-64.13%
Net income decline while ANO.AX shows 161.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-31.43%
Net margin decline while ANO.AX shows 138.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-62.96%
EPS decline while ANO.AX shows 161.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-62.96%
Diluted EPS decline while ANO.AX shows 161.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.58%
Share count reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.62% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.64%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of ANO.AX's 0.46%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.