PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-82.06%
Revenue decline while ANO.AX shows 62.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-89.91%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-66.00%
Gross profit decline while ANO.AX shows 251.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
89.45%
Similar margin change to ANO.AX's 117.07%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry pricing power.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
15.12%
G&A growth less than half of ANO.AX's 55.62%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
-3.19%
Marketing expense reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
35.54%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ANO.AX's 10.05%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-71.07%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-40.62%
D&A reduction while ANO.AX shows 129.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-115.52%
EBITDA decline while ANO.AX shows 220.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-187.42%
EBITDA margin decline while ANO.AX shows 174.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-123.40%
Operating income decline while ANO.AX shows 648.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-230.42%
Operating margin decline while ANO.AX shows 438.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-97.89%
Other expenses reduction while ANO.AX shows 40.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-124.75%
Pre-tax income decline while ANO.AX shows 160.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-237.93%
Pre-tax margin decline while ANO.AX shows 137.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-99.13%
Tax expense reduction while ANO.AX shows 155.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-139.08%
Net income decline while ANO.AX shows 161.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-317.76%
Net margin decline while ANO.AX shows 138.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-140.00%
EPS decline while ANO.AX shows 161.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-142.11%
Diluted EPS decline while ANO.AX shows 161.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.85%
Share count reduction below 50% of ANO.AX's 0.62%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-0.12%
Diluted share reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.46% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.