0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-41.24%
Revenue decline while ANO.AX shows 62.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-37.57%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-44.89%
Gross profit decline while ANO.AX shows 251.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-6.22%
Margin decline while ANO.AX shows 117.07% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
30.99%
G&A growth 50-75% of ANO.AX's 55.62%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine operational efficiency.
-21.62%
Marketing expense reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.65%
Operating expenses reduction while ANO.AX shows 10.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-30.35%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
91.33%
D&A growth 50-75% of ANO.AX's 129.13%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
-59.47%
EBITDA decline while ANO.AX shows 220.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-31.02%
EBITDA margin decline while ANO.AX shows 174.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-86.49%
Operating income decline while ANO.AX shows 648.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-77.00%
Operating margin decline while ANO.AX shows 438.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
134.95%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x ANO.AX's 40.19%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-74.45%
Pre-tax income decline while ANO.AX shows 160.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-56.52%
Pre-tax margin decline while ANO.AX shows 137.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.31%
Tax expense growth less than half of ANO.AX's 155.30%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-69.08%
Net income decline while ANO.AX shows 161.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-47.38%
Net margin decline while ANO.AX shows 138.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-70.00%
EPS decline while ANO.AX shows 161.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-70.00%
Diluted EPS decline while ANO.AX shows 161.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.93%
Share count reduction below 50% of ANO.AX's 0.62%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-2.64%
Diluted share reduction while ANO.AX shows 0.46% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.